From: "Injong Rhee" <rhee@eos.ncsu.edu>
To: "'David S. Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>, <baruch@ev-en.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, end2end-interest@postel.org,
d.leith@eee.strath.ac.uk
Subject: Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and updated 2.6.6 patches
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:11:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512200213.jBK2DbJl019826@uni03mr.unity.ncsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051219.132256.61038824.davem@davemloft.net>
I wonder the same. I wonder how this new patch by the HTCP folks
improves what we provided for the 2.6.x (which is currently
incorporated in the latest linux version). My recollection says that
this HTCP patch periodically crashes the system very often -- so we
could not run the comparison. BTW, this fast SACK path fix we provided
are just a simple clean-up and modification from the original Tom
Kelly's SACK code - so Tom deserves the full credit for it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of David S. Miller
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 4:23 PM
> To: baruch@ev-en.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; end2end-interest@postel.org;
> d.leith@eee.strath.ac.uk
> Subject: Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and
> updated 2.6.6 patches
>
> From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:26:54 +0000
>
> > Your comments on this work would be appreciated.
>
> Ummm... how about the patches that fix this which are in the 2.6.x
> kernel already?
>
> Yes, it's not your stuff, but it was incredibly less invasive and
> probably works nearly as well.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-20 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20051219.132256.61038824.davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-20 2:11 ` Injong Rhee [this message]
[not found] <20051220.010843.09466616.davem@davemloft.net>
2005-12-20 9:41 ` SACK performance improvements - technical report and updated 2.6.6 patches Injong Rhee
2005-12-19 20:26 Baruch Even
2005-12-19 21:45 ` Craig Partridge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200512200213.jBK2DbJl019826@uni03mr.unity.ncsu.edu \
--to=rhee@eos.ncsu.edu \
--cc=baruch@ev-en.org \
--cc=d.leith@eee.strath.ac.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=end2end-interest@postel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).