From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc7: known regressions Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:57:58 -0800 Message-ID: <20060102185757.GA11648@us.ibm.com> References: <20060102164636.GH17398@stusta.de> Reply-To: paulmck@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kirill Korotaev , Ismail Donmez , Michael Madore , David Brownell , Wu Fengguang , Mathias Klein , Christian Casteyde , "P. Christeas" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Torsten Seeboth , pj@sgi.com, simon.derr@bull.net, jt@hpl.hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Borzenkov , gregkh@suse.de, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, phil.el@wanadoo.fr, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, perex@suse.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Return-path: To: Adrian Bunk Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060102164636.GH17398@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:46:36PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.15-rc7 compared to 2.6.14. > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > of you was declared guilty for a breakage or in any other way involved > with one or more of these issues. [ . . . ] > Subject : BUG: spinlock recursion on 2.6.14-mm2 when oprofiling > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/18/95 > Submitter : Wu Fengguang > Handled-By : "Paul E. McKenney" > Status : unknown, reported against -mm, already fixed in -mm > (make-rcu-task_struct-safe-for-oprofile.patch) > Is this bug present in Linus' tree? No, this bug is not present in Linus's tree. Thanx, Paul