From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 23:18:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601062318.35464.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136575600.17979.58.camel@mindpipe>
On Friday 06 January 2006 20:26, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:58 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Another CPU might be stuck in a long
> > running interrupt
>
> Shouldn't a long running interrupt be considered a bug?
In normal operation yes, but there can be always exceptional
circumstances where it's unavoidable (e.g. during error handling)
and in the name of defensive programming the rest of the system ought
to tolerate it.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060105235845.967478000@sorel.sous-sol.org>
[not found] ` <20060106004555.GD25207@sorel.sous-sol.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601051727070.3169@g5.osdl.org>
2006-01-06 10:17 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:52 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency (Version 2), HOTPLUG_CPU fix Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:58 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:26 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 22:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-01-06 13:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 14:45 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 20:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-06 20:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07 0:17 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 1:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07 7:10 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 7:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07 7:44 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 7:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07 8:36 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-07 8:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:24 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601062318.35464.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).