From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:43:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060115004315.GW29663@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060105210444.GA5878@xi.wantstofly.org>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:04:44PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:57:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > >This patch removes the obsolete drivers/net/eepro100.c driver.
> > >
> > >Is there any known problem in e100 still preventing us from removing
> > >this driver (it seems noone was able anymore to verify the ARM problem)?
> >
> > Still waiting to see if e100 in -mm works on ARM.
>
> e100 seems to work okay on the (modern) ARM CPUs I've tried. The case
> where e100 failed but eepro100 worked was (I think) on older ARM hardware,
> and I'm not sure whether that kind of hardware is used anymore..
Jeff, is this enough to accept my patch?
> cheers,
> Lennert
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-15 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-05 18:18 [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Adrian Bunk
2006-01-05 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-05 21:04 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-01-15 0:43 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-15 13:19 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 18:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-17 22:27 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-18 0:32 ` John W. Linville
2006-01-18 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-18 7:41 ` [2.6 patch] schedule eepro100.c for removal Adrian Bunk
2006-01-18 10:34 ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:08 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-18 3:33 Adrian Bunk
2005-11-18 9:01 ` Russell King
2005-11-18 9:08 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 16:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-18 16:32 ` Russell King
2005-11-19 20:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:15 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 22:24 ` Russell King
2005-11-24 10:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-23 22:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-23 22:53 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 23:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 17:04 ` Tim Schmielau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060115004315.GW29663@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).