From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:43:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20060115004315.GW29663@stusta.de> References: <20060105181826.GD12313@stusta.de> <43BD6C03.2080605@pobox.com> <20060105210444.GA5878@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Lennert Buytenhek Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060105210444.GA5878@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:04:44PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:57:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >This patch removes the obsolete drivers/net/eepro100.c driver. > > > > > >Is there any known problem in e100 still preventing us from removing > > >this driver (it seems noone was able anymore to verify the ARM problem)? > > > > Still waiting to see if e100 in -mm works on ARM. > > e100 seems to work okay on the (modern) ARM CPUs I've tried. The case > where e100 failed but eepro100 worked was (I think) on older ARM hardware, > and I'm not sure whether that kind of hardware is used anymore.. Jeff, is this enough to accept my patch? > cheers, > Lennert cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed