Re: wireless: recap of current issues (configuration)

[Stuffed Crust <pizza@shaftnet.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:16:06PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Well, I'd rather trust a governement regulated network than my neighbour's
> AP ;-) In fact, some phones set their 802.11 regulatory domain based on
> the information they received from a somehow government regulated network,
> e.g. a GSM one.

The asumption is that 802.11d information, like current "regdomain"
settings, is fixed and not user-configurable.  If the regdomain is
changeable by the user, that unit would not be approved for sale in that
particular locale.

(Now 802.11d doesn't specify what to do when you hear two conflicting 
 802.11d beacons.... there go those assumptions again..)

Stations respecting 802.11d rules are not allowed to transmit on any
supported frequency until they hear an AP on that frequency first.  

This essentially means that all scans are passive until we hear an AP,
and we can't transmit on any other (presumably still silent) frequencies
unless we hear an 802.11d beacon that says we can.

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy        				 ICQ: 1318344
Melbourne, FL 					 
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]