From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>,
saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] schedule eepro100.c for removal
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060118074154.GH19398@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43CD8D72.6040501@pobox.com>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:27:16PM -0800, John Ronciak wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Another thing is that removal of the driver (or disabling the config)
> >>will hopefully force the issue in that people with these ARCHs will
> >>use the e100 and if they have problems we can get them fixed in the
> >>e100 driver. At this point nobody seems to be able to define a "real"
> >>problem other than talking about it.
>
> Someone should send me a patch that adds eepro100 to the feature-removal
> doc.
Patch below.
> jeff
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2006-01-18 08:38:57.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2006-01-18 08:39:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -164,0 +165,6 @@
+---------------------------
+
+What: eepro100 network driver
+When: April 2006
+Why: replaced by the e100 driver
+Who: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-05 18:18 [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Adrian Bunk
2006-01-05 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-05 21:04 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-01-15 0:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-15 13:19 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 18:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-17 22:27 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-18 0:32 ` John W. Linville
2006-01-18 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-18 7:41 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-18 10:34 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:08 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03 21:32 [2.6 patch] schedule eepro100.c for removal Adrian Bunk
2006-02-03 22:18 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-04 1:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-14 15:22 Adrian Bunk
2006-03-04 2:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-04 11:04 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060118074154.GH19398@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).