From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: [2.6 patch] schedule eepro100.c for removal Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:41:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20060118074154.GH19398@stusta.de> References: <20060105181826.GD12313@stusta.de> <20060115161958.07e3c7f1@vitb.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20060115160340.6f8cc7d6@localhost.localdomain> <20060117184834.GD19398@stusta.de> <56a8daef0601171427s75894fid0f8c4f9e2b28e50@mail.gmail.com> <20060118003232.GA28965@tuxdriver.com> <43CD8D72.6040501@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "John W. Linville" , John Ronciak , Stephen Hemminger , Vitaly Bordug , saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43CD8D72.6040501@pobox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:27:16PM -0800, John Ronciak wrote: > > > > > >>Another thing is that removal of the driver (or disabling the config) > >>will hopefully force the issue in that people with these ARCHs will > >>use the e100 and if they have problems we can get them fixed in the > >>e100 driver. At this point nobody seems to be able to define a "real" > >>problem other than talking about it. > > Someone should send me a patch that adds eepro100 to the feature-removal > doc. Patch below. > jeff cu Adrian <-- snip --> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk --- linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2006-01-18 08:38:57.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2006-01-18 08:39:59.000000000 +0100 @@ -164,0 +165,6 @@ +--------------------------- + +What: eepro100 network driver +When: April 2006 +Why: replaced by the e100 driver +Who: Adrian Bunk