From: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:29:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060324145912.GB7495@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1143209518.5076.21.camel@jzny2>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:11:58AM -0500, jamal wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-24-03 at 07:02 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:04:46AM -0500, jamal wrote:
>
> > 3. nlmsg_new() now allocates for 2*u32 + sizeof(taskstats)
>
> Not the right size; the u32 covers the V part of TLV. The T = 16 bits
> and L = 16 bits. And if you nest TLVs, then it gets more interesting.
>
> Look at using proper macros instead of hard coding like you did.
> grep for something like RTA_SPACE and perhaps send a patch to make it
> generic for netlink.h
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
My bad, but I was wondering why my test case did not segfault until
I saw the implementation of nlmsg_new :-)
I will fix this and use nla_total_size() to calculate the correct sizes
including padding and TLV.
Thanks again,
Balbir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-24 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1142296834.5858.3.camel@elinux04.optonline.net>
2006-03-14 0:55 ` [Patch 8/9] generic netlink utility functions Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-26 16:44 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-26 17:06 ` jamal
2006-03-14 0:56 ` [Patch 9/9] Generic netlink interface for delay accounting Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-14 2:29 ` jamal
2006-03-14 2:33 ` Matt Helsley
2006-03-14 2:48 ` jamal
2006-03-14 4:18 ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-03-22 7:49 ` [RFC][UPDATED PATCH 2.6.16] " Balbir Singh
2006-03-23 14:04 ` jamal
2006-03-23 15:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 14:04 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:54 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 1:19 ` jamal
2006-03-25 9:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 12:52 ` jamal
2006-03-25 15:36 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-25 17:48 ` jamal
2006-03-25 18:22 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-26 14:05 ` jamal
2006-03-26 16:40 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 1:32 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-24 14:11 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:19 ` jamal
2006-03-24 14:59 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2006-03-14 4:29 ` Shailabh Nagar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060324145912.GB7495@in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).