From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Tourrilhes Subject: Re: 32bit compat for rtnetlink wireless extensions? Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:17:54 -0800 Message-ID: <20060327211754.GB31813@bougret.hpl.hp.com> References: <200603261408.48766.arnd@arndb.de> <20060327184242.GC31478@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <200603272310.44692.arnd@arndb.de> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200603272310.44692.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 11:10:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Am Monday 27 March 2006 20:42 schrieb Jean Tourrilhes: > > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Actually, when things are passed over RtNet= link, the pointer > > is removed, and the content of IW_HEADER_TYPE_POINT is moved to not > > leave a gap. >=20 > Ah, that makes sense, thanks for the explanation. >=20 > So if the wireless ioctl interface ever got retired, that code could > get simplified a lot to just pass around a flat data structure, right= ? >=20 > Arnd <>< Actually, it could be removed *now*. You would just have to fix all wireless drivers in existence. I will scratch my head to see if we could plan a smooth transition. Jean