From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
bharata@in.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dcache leak in 2.6.16-git8 II
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:50:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060330095048.GW27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603300026.59131.ak@suse.de>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 12:26:58AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> dentry_cache 999168 1024594 208 19 1 : tunables 120 60 8 : slabdata 53926 53926 0 : shrinker stat 18522624 8871000
>
> Hrm interesting is this one:
>
> sock_inode_cache 996784 996805 704 5 1 : tunables 54 27 8 : slabdata 199361 199361 0
>
> Most of the leaked dentries seem to be sockets. I didn't notice this earlier.
ITYM "all". You've got 2384 non-socket dentries, which is about what I'd
expect on severely pressured busy system...
> This was with the debugging patches applied btw.
>
> So maybe we have a socket leak?
Looks like that. Note: /proc/slab_allocators won't help here; all allocations
into that cache are done from sock_alloc_inode(), which is what will be shown.
Not useful... Moreover, call chain is predictable several steps deeper than
that: sock_alloc_inode() (as ->alloc_inode()) from alloc_inode() from
new_inode() from sock_alloc().
FWIW... One thing that might be useful here:
a) slab_set_creator(objp, cachep, address): no-op unless DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK set,
void slab_set_creator(void *objp, struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *address)
{
if (cachep->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER)
*dbg_userword(cachep, objp) = address;
}
otherwise (has to be function in mm/slab.c; exported).
b)
void slab_charge_here(void *objp, struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *address)
{
slab_set_creator(objp, cachep, __builtin_return_address(0));
}
in mm/slab.c (exported)
c) #define slab_charge_caller(objp, cachep) \
slab_set_creator((objp), (cachep), __builtin_return_address(0))
Then we can do the following: in sock_alloc() have
slab_charge_caller(container_of(inode, struct socket_alloc, vfs_inode),
sock_inode_cachep);
and _then_ /proc/slab_allocators will charge these guys to callers of
sock_alloc(); if you'll need to pursue it further, you can always slap
more slab_charge_...() where needed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-30 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200603270750.28174.ak@suse.de>
[not found] ` <200603271822.28043.ak@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20060327190027.24498e3a.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-03-29 22:26 ` dcache leak in 2.6.16-git8 II Andi Kleen
2006-03-29 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-29 22:53 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-30 6:41 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-30 9:50 ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-03-30 10:12 ` Al Viro
2006-03-30 10:36 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060330095048.GW27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bharata@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).