From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denis Vlasenko Subject: tcf_generic_walker(): what's going on? Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:11:00 +0300 Message-ID: <200604060911.01140.vda@ilport.com.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org While hunting down oversized inlines I stumbled on tcf_generic_walker(). It is defined in two separate files: once as an inline in include/net/pkt_act.h (really big one, ~750 bytes of code) and once as a static function in net/sched/act_police.c These two instances are not identical. Second one has one extra parameter (int type) and it uses it like this: for (i = 0; i < MY_TAB_SIZE; i++) { p = tcf_police_ht[tcf_police_hash(i)]; for (; p; p = p->next) { index++; if (index < s_i) continue; a->priv = p; a->order = index; r = (struct rtattr*) skb->tail; RTA_PUT(skb, a->order, 0, NULL); + if (type == RTM_DELACTION) + err = tcf_action_dump_1(skb, a, 0, 1); + else + err = tcf_action_dump_1(skb, a, 0, 0); Having two functions with same name is rather confusing. Worse, they are both are called via five different tc_action_ops structs: static struct tc_action_ops act_ipt_ops = { ... .walk = tcf_generic_walker and I fail to understand how it is supposed to work, considering the fact that these two tcf_generic_walker's have different prototypes. 1) What should I do with tcf_generic_walker? 2) Should I deinline huge inlines in include/net/pkt_act.h? If yes, to which .c file should I move them? -- vda