From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: bcm43xx symbol clash problems Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:59:05 +0200 Message-ID: <200604111859.06594.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <200604100216.21571.mb@bu3sch.de> <200604111835.03948.mb@bu3sch.de> <1144773747.4888.37.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Return-path: To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1144773747.4888.37.camel@localhost> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: bcm43xx-dev-admin-tdrK/OAtAx2ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: bcm43xx-dev-admin-tdrK/OAtAx2ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 11 April 2006 18:42, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 18:35 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > Sure. I would probably say that both m should conflict, too. > > Nah, you probably want both m for testing. I am OK with this, but it fucks up module autoloading. But that is probably OK. -- Greetings Michael.