netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>
To: Dave Dillow <dave@thedillows.org>
Cc: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>, Ingo Oeser <netdev@axxeo.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [RFD][PATCH] typhoon and core sample for folding away VLAN stuff
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:38:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604131138.59611.vda@ilport.com.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <443DA830.8030209@thedillows.org>

On Thursday 13 April 2006 04:24, Dave Dillow wrote:
> Regardless, I remain opposed to this particular instance of bloat 
> busting. While both patches have improved in style, they remove a useful 
> feature and make the code less clean, for no net gain.

What happened to non-modular build? "no net gain" is not true.
 
> > This kind of changes are important, because bloat creeps in byte by byte
> > of unused features. So I really appreciate your work here Denis.
> 
> On SMP FC4, typhoon.ko has a text size of 68330, so you need to cut 2794 
> bytes to see an actual difference in memory usage for a module. Non-SMP 
> it is 67741, so there you only need to cut 2205 bytes to get a win.

This is silly. Should I go this route and try a dozen of different gcc
versions and "-O2 versus -Os" things to demonstrate that sometimes
it will matter?
--
vda

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-13  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200604071628.30486.vda@ilport.com.ua>
     [not found] ` <200604101716.58463.vda@ilport.com.ua>
     [not found]   ` <1144682807.12177.22.camel@dillow.idleaire.com>
2006-04-11  7:28     ` [PATCH] deinline a few large functions in vlan code v2 Denis Vlasenko
2006-04-11  8:02       ` David S. Miller
2006-04-11  9:49       ` Ingo Oeser
     [not found]         ` <200604111502.52302.vda@ilport.com.ua>
2006-04-11 13:17           ` Ingo Oeser
2006-04-12 19:32             ` [RFD][PATCH] typhoon and core sample for folding away VLAN stuff (was: Re: [PATCH] deinline a few large functions in vlan code v2) Ingo Oeser
2006-04-12 20:10               ` [RFD][PATCH] typhoon and core sample for folding away VLAN stuff Ben Greear
2006-04-12 20:23                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-12 20:51                 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-13  1:24               ` Dave Dillow
2006-04-13  8:38                 ` Denis Vlasenko [this message]
2006-04-13 15:00                   ` Dave Dillow
2006-04-11 13:59       ` [PATCH] deinline a few large functions in vlan code v2 Dave Dillow
2006-04-12  8:55         ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-04-12 17:18           ` Dave Dillow
2006-04-13  6:04             ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-04-13 14:59               ` Dave Dillow
2006-04-13 11:32             ` Ingo Oeser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200604131138.59611.vda@ilport.com.ua \
    --to=vda@ilport.com.ua \
    --cc=dave@thedillows.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@axxeo.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).