netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Martin Diehl <info@mdiehl.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sir: switch to a workqueue
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:37:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060415163712.GA13342@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0604151444521.19061-100000@notebook.home.mdiehl.de>

On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 04:24:15PM +0200, Martin Diehl wrote:
> 
> My only concern with this patch is this:

<..>

> Hm, queue_work might fail (like it was possible with irda_queue_request), 
> if work->pending is set. In that case, chances are we have a partially 
> configured irda device dangling around. The idea was to (re-)enable rx and 
> restore the xmit queue state on netdev so we can rely on the upper layers 
> to recover. I think without the fallback the netdev might become unuseable 
> until ifdown/ifup-cycle, if queue_work would ever fail.

queue_work doesn't fail if work->pending, it just noticed this
particular work_Struct is already beeing serviced and tells you that.
In the sir code that can't happen because the work_struct has ben
allocated and initialized a few lines above, so there's zero chance for
someone else to call queue_work on it concurrently.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-15 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-14 18:20 [PATCH] sir: switch to a workqueue Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-14 18:22 ` Jean Tourrilhes
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0604151444521.19061-100000@notebook.home.mdiehl.de>
2006-04-15 16:37   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060415163712.GA13342@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=info@mdiehl.de \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).