From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Fix several errors in extension header handling. Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060418.144914.24796175.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060419.002045.85775401.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:12434 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750713AbWDRVtQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:49:16 -0400 To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20060419.002045.85775401.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:20:45 +0900 (JST) > Following changesets fix several errors in extension header handling. > I'd propose to push them (except 4/4, maybe) to -stable. > > [PATCH 1/4] [IPV6]: Ensure to have hop-by-hop options in our header of &sk_buff. > [PATCH 2/4] [IPV6] XFRM: Don't use old copy of pointer after pskb_may_pull(). > [PATCH 3/4] [IPV6] XFRM: Fix decoding session with preceding extension header(s). > [PATCH 4/4] [IPV6]: Clean up hop-by-hop options handler. All applied, and I agree with pushing 1-3 into -stable, please send it.