From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] ebtables: clean up vmalloc usage in net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060419.160328.128989267.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060419065025.GE17192@random.pao.digeo.com> <20060419.154126.64036253.davem@davemloft.net> <20060419155925.7aae7d25.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jchandra@digeo.com, bridge@osdl.org, bdschuym@pandora.be, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:56232 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751318AbWDSXD3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:03:29 -0400 To: akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20060419155925.7aae7d25.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:59:25 -0700 > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > > An earlier variant of your patch was applied already, included below. > > You'll need to submit the newer parts relative to the current tree. > > This is a similar-but-different patch. It applies OK. > > I reviewed it (mostly - it's somewhat non-trivial to do this) and queued it > up and was planning on sending it to you for post-2.6.17. It's at least fixing a few bugs, and the parts which are cleanups undoubtedly should prevent bugs in the future, so I think we should consider it for 2.6.17 right?