From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] ebtables: clean up vmalloc usage in net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:13:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20060419161324.02e46449.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060419065025.GE17192@random.pao.digeo.com> <20060419.154126.64036253.davem@davemloft.net> <20060419155925.7aae7d25.akpm@osdl.org> <20060419.160328.128989267.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jchandra@digeo.com, bridge@osdl.org, bdschuym@pandora.be, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:48080 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbWDSXLd (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:11:33 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20060419.160328.128989267.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org "David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:59:25 -0700 > > > "David S. Miller" wrote: > > > > > > An earlier variant of your patch was applied already, included below. > > > You'll need to submit the newer parts relative to the current tree. > > > > This is a similar-but-different patch. It applies OK. > > > > I reviewed it (mostly - it's somewhat non-trivial to do this) and queued it > > up and was planning on sending it to you for post-2.6.17. > > It's at least fixing a few bugs, and the parts which are cleanups > undoubtedly should prevent bugs in the future, so I think we > should consider it for 2.6.17 right? afaict it's just a cleanup, but whatever - I'll send it over now.