From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: I/OAT: Call for discussion
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:49:02 +0200
Message-ID: <200604200249.03167.ak@suse.de>
References: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D8E9F0A@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:22732 "EHLO mx2.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750702AbWDTAtQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:49:16 -0400
To: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D8E9F0A@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 19 April 2006 18:39, Grover, Andrew wrote:

> We have posted all the performance data we have gathered so far on the
> linux-net wiki: http://linux-net.osdl.org/index.php/I/OAT , and listed
> the overall concerns that have been expressed in private. I'm hoping you
> will look at the data, re-examine the patches, and then we can talk
> about the technical issues here on the list, getting down to the
> specifics, so we can hash it out in public and settle on the right path
> to take.

Maybe it would be best if you just reposted the patches? 

-Andi