netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jouni Malinen" <jkm@devicescape.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/10] d80211: get rid of default management interface
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 19:44:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060422024431.GJ27215@instant802.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060421205328.39BE2482C1@silver.suse.cz>

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> Default management interface (wlanXap) confuses users. It is only needed for
> AP mode (and only until interfaces are converted to use native 802.11
> frames).

Or when using user space MLME in client mode which is something that I
just got working as far as scanning and association is concerned. In
other words, wpa_supplicant will be needing this interface..

> This patch removes default management interface. When a new interface is
> switched to AP mode, a management interface is created automatically. This
> also fixes some problems with multiple AP interfaces - now you have
> different management interface for each AP interface.

That sounds like something that could break multi-BSSID/SSID aware
hostapd. Are you saying that there would be new wlanXap like interface
for each BSS/VLAN interface? What are the problems this is fixing with
multiple AP interfaces? So far, hostapd has been responsible for
receiving all management from a single interface and then internally
decide which BSS/multi-SSID entry to use for each.

I would assume that hostapd could be changed to process frames from
multiple interfaces (at least if this is only for multi-BSSID, not for
multi-SSID/VLAN case). There may be some special cases, where it would
be easier to just be able to use one interface. Likewise, I would expect
single interface to be closer to a design that would be using netlink
for getting management frames into user space.

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-04-22 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-21 20:53 [PATCH 0/10] d80211: bugfixes and reducing number of interfaces Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 1/10] d80211: fix SIOCGIWESSID ioctl Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/10] d80211: use is_multicast_ether_addr Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 3/10] d80211: fix Oops caused by packets sent directly to master device Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 4/10] d80211: don't use pointer in ieee80211_tx_control Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 5/10] d80211: per-interface SSID Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 6/10] d80211: per-interface generic_elem Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 7/10] d80211: get rid of default AP interface Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 8/10] d80211: get rid of default management interface Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:59   ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-21 21:03     ` Jiri Benc
2006-04-22  2:44   ` Jouni Malinen [this message]
2006-04-24 13:01     ` Jiri Benc
2006-04-26 18:53       ` John W. Linville
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 9/10] d80211: rename master interface Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 21:02   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-21 21:06     ` Jiri Benc
2006-04-21 20:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] d80211: add one default interface Jiri Benc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060422024431.GJ27215@instant802.com \
    --to=jkm@devicescape.com \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).