From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rough VJ Channel Implementation - vj_core.patch Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060426.155937.69145445.davem@davemloft.net> References: <54AD0F12E08D1541B826BE97C98F99F143AEC1@NT-SJCA-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeff@garzik.org, kelly@au1.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:41177 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964886AbWDZXAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:00:17 -0400 To: caitlinb@broadcom.com In-Reply-To: <54AD0F12E08D1541B826BE97C98F99F143AEC1@NT-SJCA-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Caitlin Bestler" Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:53:44 -0700 > The netchannel qualifiers should only deal with TCP packets > for established connections. Listens would continue to be > dealt with by the existing stack logic, vj_channelizing > only occurring when the the connection was accepted. I consider netchannel support for listening TCP sockets to be absolutely essential.