From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rough VJ Channel Implementation - vj_core.patch Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060426.231705.67148890.davem@davemloft.net> References: <54AD0F12E08D1541B826BE97C98F99F143AE6C@NT-SJCA-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> <1146109226.11864.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: caitlinb@broadcom.com, kelly@au1.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:41886 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964955AbWD0GRV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:17:21 -0400 To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au In-Reply-To: <1146109226.11864.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:40:26 +1000 > We *used* to have an nf_cache mechanism to determine exactly when the > netfilter hooks cared about a packet, but it was never used and was hard > to reconcile with connection-tracking timeouts... Let's not consider bringing that thing back :-)