From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rough VJ Channel Implementation - vj_core.patch Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060428.153833.68265167.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1146212660.8029.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060428.122102.76435590.davem@davemloft.net> <1146261844.8029.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: caitlinb@broadcom.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, kelly@au1.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:50057 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWD1Wia (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:38:30 -0400 To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au In-Reply-To: <1146261844.8029.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:04:04 +1000 > You're still thinking you can bypass classifiers for established > sockets, but I really don't think you can. I think the simplest > solution is to effectively remove from (or flag) the established & > listening hashes anything which could be effected by classifiers, so > those packets get send through the default channel. OK, when rules are installed, the socket channel mappings are flushed. This is your idea right?