From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rough VJ Channel Implementation - vj_core.patch Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:52:40 +0400 Message-ID: <20060428195238.GA21294@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20060428172932.GB16916@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060428104118.6a056a59@localhost.localdomain> <20060428175538.GA13898@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060428.121636.54294183.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, caitlinb@broadcom.com, kelly@au1.ibm.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:58848 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449AbWD1Txz (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:53:55 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060428.121636.54294183.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:16:36PM -0700, David S. Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote: > From: Evgeniy Polyakov > Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:55:39 +0400 > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:41:18AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger (shemminger@osdl.org) wrote: > > > Second, introducing > > > kevents, seems unnecessary and hasn't been accepted in the mainline. > > > > kevent was never sent to lkml@ although it showed over 40% win over epoll for > > test web server. Sending it to lkml@ is just jumping into ... not into > > technical world, so I posted it first here, but without much attention > > though. > > Frankly I found kevents to be a very strong idea. Glad to hear this. I probably should resend patches netdev@ and (mar my karma) send it to lkml@...? -- Evgeniy Polyakov