From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: wireless-dev: warnings while removing bcm43xx-d80211
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 14:49:45 +0200
Message-ID: <200604301449.46431.mb@bu3sch.de>
References: <1146308425.5019.38.camel@localhost> <20060430141520.5f0ef66a@logostar.upir.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart10830473.4zreOQX36Q";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Broadcom Linux <bcm43xx-dev@berlios.de>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:11754
	"EHLO bu3sch.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751104AbWD3MoB
	(ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 30 Apr 2006 08:44:01 -0400
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20060430141520.5f0ef66a@logostar.upir.cz>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

--nextPart10830473.4zreOQX36Q
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 30 April 2006 14:15, you wrote:
> Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:00:25 +0200, Johannes Berg pise:
> > This didn't look too good to me, maybe someone can investigate?
> >=20
> > [24070.841580] Badness in remove_proc_entry at fs/proc/generic.c:732
> > [24070.841593] Call Trace:
> > [...]
>=20
> I know about this (also mentioned it at Wireless summit), I'm working on
> it.

Hm, seems like I did not listen to you. :P
How does this happen? I never saw it.

=2D-=20
Greetings Michael.

--nextPart10830473.4zreOQX36Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEVLJqlb09HEdWDKgRAnjJAJ0TzInXS8N9iwlGl8ogCiyfg9wMBQCfWAiz
SUxbWi5ABndrzen0k9Rvy7M=
=cats
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart10830473.4zreOQX36Q--