From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipg: leaks in ipg_probe Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 20:33:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20060502183313.GA26357@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <1146306567.1642.3.camel@localhost> <20060429122119.GA22160@fargo> <1146342905.11271.3.camel@localhost> <1146389171.11524.1.camel@localhost> <44554ADE.8030200@cantab.net> <4455F1D8.5030102@cantab.net> <1146506939.23931.2.camel@localhost> <20060501231050.GC7419@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Vrabel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, david@pleyades.net Return-path: Received: from electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com ([213.41.134.224]:20421 "EHLO fr.zoreil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964960AbWEBSgE (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 14:36:04 -0400 To: Pekka J Enberg Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Pekka J Enberg : [...] > Is this tested with hardware? No. > Alignment of the start address looks bogus for sure, but any idea > why they had it in the first place? No clear idea but it matches the significant part of the BAR register for the 256 bytes of I/O space that the device uses. -- Ueimor