From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] ipvs: use proper timeout instead of fixed value
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:57:26 -0400
Message-ID: <20060505185726.GB24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
References: <20060504201116.GA24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060505004754.GA6943@verge.net.au> <20060505025111.GA29142@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060505032052.GY32328@verge.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	wensong@linux-vs.org, ja@ssi.bg
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:2456 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485AbWEES5m (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 5 May 2006 14:57:42 -0400
To: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060505032052.GY32328@verge.net.au>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I missunderstood your patch completely the first time around.
> Yes I think this is an excellent idea. Assuming its tested and works
> I'm happy to sign off on it and prod DaveM.

Horms,

I'll get a setup together and post results when I have them.

-andy