From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH]ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation Date: Sun, 07 May 2006 22:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060507.224121.38748103.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1138821701.3852.8.camel@L-tech1> <20060202.170840.114568749.davem@davemloft.net> <200605051350.03300.weiyj@soft.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:28117 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932315AbWEHFlN (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 01:41:13 -0400 To: weiyj@soft.fujitsu.com In-Reply-To: <200605051350.03300.weiyj@soft.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: weiyj@soft.fujitsu.com Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:50:02 -0400 > Does this patch will be used? > > This patch resolved the following problem: When I send IPv4 packet(contain > Record Route Option) which need to be fragmented to the router, the router > can not fragment it correctly. After fragmented by router, the second > fragmentation still contain Record Route Option. Refer to RFC791, Record > Route Option must Not be copied on fragmentation, goes in first fragment > only. Actually it didn't get applied for some reason. Please resubmit it properly with a full changelog and "Signed-off-by: " lines, and make double sure that your email client does not corrupt the patch so that I may apply it cleanly. Test this by sending it to yourself and trying to apply the patch. Thanks.