From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Horms Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] ipvs: use proper timeout instead of fixed value Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:38:40 +0900 Message-ID: <20060507043838.GF8374@verge.net.au> References: <20060504201116.GA24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060505004754.GA6943@verge.net.au> <20060505025111.GA29142@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20060505032052.GY32328@verge.net.au> <20060505185726.GB24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, wensong@linux-vs.org, ja@ssi.bg Return-path: Received: from koto.vergenet.net ([210.128.90.7]:9930 "EHLO koto.vergenet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750949AbWEGEuC (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 May 2006 00:50:02 -0400 To: Andy Gospodarek Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060505185726.GB24394@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:57:26PM -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:20:54PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > Sorry, I missunderstood your patch completely the first time around. > > Yes I think this is an excellent idea. Assuming its tested and works > > I'm happy to sign off on it and prod DaveM. > > Horms, > > I'll get a setup together and post results when I have them. I was thinking that it would be nice if the timeout could be sent over the wire, though that might bring in some compatibility issues, and thus your approach might be the best idea. -- Horms http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/