From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rough VJ Channel Implementation - vj_core.patch
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20060515.180535.90170603.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20060504.161148.44973535.davem@davemloft.net>
	<200605051248.42662.kelly@au.ibm.com>
	<200605161102.29472.kelly@au.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:50879
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750920AbWEPBFq (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 15 May 2006 21:05:46 -0400
To: kelly@au1.ibm.com
In-Reply-To: <200605161102.29472.kelly@au.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Kelly Daly <kelly@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 11:02:29 +1000

> On Friday 05 May 2006 12:48, Kelly Daly wrote:
> > done!  I will continue with implementation of default netchannel for now.

Some context?  It's been a week since we were discussing this,
so I'd like to know what we're looking at here in this patch :)