From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul P Komkoff Jr Subject: Re: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?) Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 12:13:08 +0400 Message-ID: <20060523081308.GB8196@stingr.net> References: <1148322152.15322.299.camel@galen.zko.hp.com> <4472078D.8010706@hp.com> <1148332293.17376.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060522.161951.92584947.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, rick.jones2@hp.com, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com, i@stingr.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from stingr.net ([212.193.32.15]:30651 "EHLO stingr.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932105AbWEWINm (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2006 04:13:42 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060522.161951.92584947.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Replying to David S. Miller: > That's my position too and I'm pretty much going to ignore any > request to change this behavior. Accorind to this article, some people count this as security issue: http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/427622 Well ... someone with Cisco support contract can open a TAC case on this ? -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key This message represents the official view of the voices in my head