From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 01:31:49 -0500
Message-ID: <20060524063149.GE11414@localdomain>
References: <20060524001653.19403.31396.stgit@gitlost.site> <20060524002012.19403.50151.stgit@gitlost.site> <20060523174827.0ce1943b.akpm@osdl.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rune.pobox.com ([208.210.124.79]:18079 "EHLO rune.pobox.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932616AbWEXGb4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 24 May 2006 02:31:56 -0400
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060523174827.0ce1943b.akpm@osdl.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > +	for_each_cpu(i)
> 
> That's about to be deleted.  Please use for_each_possible_cpu().
> 
> That's if for_each_possible_cpu() is appropriate.

It is -- those loops traverse chan->local, which is alloc_percpu'd,
which allocates for all possible cpus.