From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6 Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:42:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20060524124223.GB10156@tuxdriver.com> References: <20060522191759.GD13964@tuxdriver.com> <20060522191942.GE13964@tuxdriver.com> <4473E288.3030005@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([24.172.12.4]:59655 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932301AbWEXMmm (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2006 08:42:42 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4473E288.3030005@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:35:20AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: > >The following changes since commit > >01d654d25d23fb73deb7904ce1c0b3a0f5fc2908: > > John W. Linville: > > Merge branch 'upstream-fixes' into upstream > > > >are found in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git > > upstream > > > >Marcin Juszkiewicz: > > hostap: new pcmcia IDs > > > > drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_cs.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > WTF??? I pull, and see diffstat: > > Merge db21e578e551421d76641d72cb3f8296ed3f9e61, made by recursive. > drivers/net/wireless/airo.c | 2 ... > This is vastly different from any 'pull upstream' email I've received > from you. It is extremely uncool for me to pull, and receive something > other than what your email specified. Jeff, I am terribly sorry. I sent a request for this on 24 April, but it does not appear in the archives. It must have been dropped (probably due to size) by the netdev list filters, and I neglected to notice. /me wishes the list would send me a note when it drops stuff due to size... > Nonetheless, I looked over the changes and they look OK, so I took the > lazy route and kept them. I greatly appreciate that! > For the future, I would perhaps recommend creating an upstream-jeff > branch at the time of submission, if you insist upon continuing to push The point is well taken. It probably does make sense either to have an upstream-jeff branch or to make a new branch if you haven't yet pulled. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com