From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Amit S. Kale" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Resending NetXen 1G/10G NIC driver patch Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 16:41:41 +0530 Message-ID: <200605271641.41672.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> References: <200605261116.50176.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, sanjeev@unminc.com, unmproj@linsyssoft.com Return-path: Received: from svr68.ehostpros.com ([67.15.48.48]:45260 "EHLO svr68.ehostpros.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751466AbWE0LMQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2006 07:12:16 -0400 To: Roland Dreier In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Saturday 27 May 2006 01:32, Roland Dreier wrote: > Amit> We'll implement the minor changes rightaway and post an > Amit> update. We are also thinking about what's the best way to > Amit> incorporate the data structure changes you have > Amit> suggested. Will post a reply on that too soon. > > By the way, my suggestion to the original posting still stands: use a > descriptive subject line and include a changelog entry for each patch > that you expect to be merged. This is only one patch which we expect to be merged. We broke it into several parts only to make reviews easier. I'll also post a changelog entry next time. Would be simple AFAICS: "Added NetXen 1G/10G NIC support". Am I missing something? -Amit