From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Subject: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn() Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:46:08 -0600 Message-ID: <20060601004608.C21730@openss7.org> References: <20060531090301.GA26782@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060531035124.B3065@openss7.org> <20060531105814.GB7806@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060531.114127.14356069.davem@davemloft.net> <20060601060424.GA28087@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060601001825.A21730@openss7.org> <20060601063012.GC28087@2ka.mipt.ru> Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , draghuram@rocketmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from gw.openss7.com ([142.179.199.224]:38035 "EHLO gw.openss7.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbWFAGqK (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 02:46:10 -0400 To: Evgeniy Polyakov Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060601063012.GC28087@2ka.mipt.ru>; from johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru on Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:30:13AM +0400 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Evgeniy, On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Since pseudo-randomness affects both folded and not folded hash > distribution, it can not end up in different results. Yes it would, so to rule out pseudo-random effects the pseudo- random number generator must be removed. > > You are right that having test with 2^48 values is really interesting, > but it will take ages on my test machine :) Try a usable subset; no pseudo-random number generator.