From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
draghuram@rocketmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:10:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060602091015.C18533@openss7.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060602074845.GA17798@2ka.mipt.ru>; from johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru on Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:48:46AM +0400
Evgeniy,
I agree, even with constant source IP, the hash still should have
performed better (but didn't). Constant source IP and varying
port is a realistic data set for a port proxy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060531042908.10463.qmail@web51410.mail.yahoo.com>
[not found] ` <20060530235525.A30563@openss7.org>
2006-05-31 7:10 ` Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn() David Miller
2006-05-31 7:45 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 7:49 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 8:00 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 9:12 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 9:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 9:51 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 10:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 11:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 13:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 18:29 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:18 ` David Miller
2006-06-01 6:22 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:24 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 18:41 ` David Miller
2006-06-01 6:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:18 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:46 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 7:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 7:11 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 8:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 10:24 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 11:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 18:40 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 20:21 ` David Miller
2006-06-02 7:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-02 5:40 ` Florian Weimer
2006-06-02 7:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-02 15:10 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock [this message]
2006-06-02 17:26 ` Florian Weimer
2006-06-02 17:37 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:52 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 8:49 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:02 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 9:39 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060602091015.C18533@openss7.org \
--to=bidulock@openss7.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=draghuram@rocketmail.com \
--cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).