From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frank van Maarseveen Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc4: netfilter LOG messages truncated via NETCONSOLE (2) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 16:39:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20060602143922.GA8572@janus> References: <447DAEC9.3050003@trash.net> <20060531160611.GA25637@janus> <447DC613.10102@trash.net> <20060531172936.GB25788@janus> <447DD66C.30605@trash.net> <20060601091124.GA31642@janus> <447F2537.1080807@trash.net> <20060602123559.GA7505@janus> <20060602140212.GA7881@janus> <44804828.2050909@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kernel Netdev Mailing List Return-path: Received: from frankvm.xs4all.nl ([80.126.170.174]:14208 "EHLO janus.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932118AbWFBOjY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:39:24 -0400 To: Patrick McHardy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44804828.2050909@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Which network driver are you using? I've seen it with two completely different NICs at the sender side: 0000:02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 05) 0000:02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 01) Snippet from bootlog: Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.10-k2-NAPI Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:08.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0x40400000, irq 16, MAC addr 00:08:C7:69:29:AE Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: netconsole: device eth0 not up yet, forcing it Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: netconsole: carrier detect appears untrustworthy, waiting 4 seconds Jun 2 16:24:05 posio kernel: netconsole: network logging started > Does this patch show anything in > the ringbuffer? no. > --- a/net/core/netpoll.c > +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c > @@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ static void netpoll_send_skb(struct netp > netpoll_poll(np); > udelay(50); > } while (npinfo->tries > 0); > + > + printk("failed to transmit\n"); > + kfree_skb(skb); > } > > void netpoll_send_udp(struct netpoll *np, const char *msg, int len) -- Frank