From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [PATCH, RTF/RFC] bcm43xx: Enable local IRQs while executing periodic work Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 21:13:31 +0200 Message-ID: <200606052113.31629.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <200605231723.10028.mb@bu3sch.de> <20060605185433.GF6068@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, "John W. Linville" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060605185433.GF6068-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline To: "Undisclosed.Recipients": ; Sender: bcm43xx-dev-admin-tdrK/OAtAx2ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: bcm43xx-dev-admin-tdrK/OAtAx2ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Monday 05 June 2006 20:54, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 05:23:09PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > I would like to get this into wireless-2.6, but before that > > happens I would like to have a few regression tests by people. > > Please apply this and run high network traffic for 10-15 minutes. > > Please enable kernel spinlock lockup and recursion detection > > while testing. > > It has almost been two weeks...do we want this patch, or not? The two patches [PATCH 1/2] bcm43xx: redesign locking [PATCH 2/2] bcm43xx: preemptible periodic work are the successors of it. ;) So, no, I don't want that old and broken patch any longer. But thanks that you asked. I forgot about it. -- Greetings Michael.