netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: Linux kernel and laws
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:33:50 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060606053350.GA5905@2ka.mipt.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060605140226.GR3955@stusta.de>

On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:02:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk (bunk@stusta.de) wrote:
> > Far too many people have a careless "U.S.A. laws suck, merge it anyway"
> > attitude.
> If someone would state a submission to the kernel might have issues 
> according to Chinese laws, or Iranian laws, or Russian laws, would this 
> be enough for keeping code out of the kernel?

Btw, did kernel hackers consulted with Papua New Guinea or bloody
Russian laws? It is possible that they have a law which forbids to write 
open source code. So we should stop Linux kernel development and completely 
remove it's sources from the Internet ASAP.

P.S. It is explicitly permitted to make reverse engineering in Russia.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-06  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-06-05  1:06 ` wireless (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans) Jeff Garzik
2006-06-05  1:15   ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-05  8:33     ` Andreas Mohr
2006-06-05  8:45       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-05 10:26         ` Alan Cox
2006-06-05 10:35           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-05 10:59             ` Alan Cox
2006-06-10  6:58             ` Pavel Machek
2006-06-05  8:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-05 12:33     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-05 12:48       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-05 12:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-05 14:02           ` Linux kernel and laws Adrian Bunk
2006-06-05 14:21             ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-06-06  5:33             ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2006-06-05 13:27     ` wireless (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans) John W. Linville
2006-06-05 13:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-06-05 13:42       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-05 16:24       ` Alan Cox
2006-06-29 14:26         ` ACX100 (softmac-based) driver ready to merge, but is it legal? -- " John W. Linville
     [not found]           ` <20060629144233.GB24463@tuxdriver.com>
2006-06-29 14:47             ` [Acx100-users] Denis Vlasenko, where are you? (mail bounced) Andreas Mohr
2006-07-06 17:29           ` ACX100 (softmac-based) driver ready to merge, but is it legal? Denis Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060606053350.GA5905@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).