From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, jirislaby@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de, mingo@elte.hu,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, mingo@redhat.com,
arjan@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type instead
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:18:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060612.001829.49243997.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060612070356.GA1273@gondor.apana.org.au>
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:56 +1000
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the
> > only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator
> > patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process.
> > So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on
> > the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with
> > them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue.
> > Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the
> > validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem
> > submission rules.
>
> Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine. However,
> it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that
> they get a wider review. If you've already sent this one there then
> I apologise for missing it :)
Yes, this is fine with me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-12 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200606060250.k562oCrA004583@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
[not found] ` <44852819.2080503@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4485798B.4030007@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
2006-06-06 16:39 ` 2.6.17-rc5-mm3-lockdep - Stefan Richter
2006-06-07 7:12 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-12 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 6:41 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-12 6:57 ` [patch] undo AF_UNIX _bh locking changes and split lock-type instead Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 7:03 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-12 7:18 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-06-12 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-12 20:08 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 6:50 ` 2.6.17-rc5-mm3-lockdep - David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060612.001829.49243997.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).