From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@coreworks.de, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [ PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 1/1] udp.c: counting InDatagrams which are never delivered
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:02:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606120702.46014@strip-the-willow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060611.212913.70218067.davem@davemloft.net>
Quoting David Miller:
|
| > Fix: Move the `UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS)' statement from
| > udp_queue_rcv_skb to udp_recvmsg. Now InDatagrams only counts those
| > datagrams which were really delivered (as per RFC 2013).
| >
|
| Unfortunately this breaks NFS and other in-kernel UDP socket usages,
| which never call recvmsg() and instead take the packet via the
| ->data_ready() callback done by sock_queue_receive_skb().
|
| Your patch will make the counter never get incremented when such
| a user is using the UDP socket.
|
| Probably a better way to handle this is to correct the
| INDATAGRAMS value by decrementing it when we notice that
| the checksum is incorrect in a deferred manner.
This is clearly preferable - would it look like this:
csum_copy_err:
UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INERRORS);
UDP_DEC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS); /* requires new macro */
skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags);
/* ... */
in udp_recvmsg? Here I must pass - there is no xxx_DEC_BH macro in
include/net/snmp.h and I don't know whether the following guess is correct:
#define SNMP_DEC_STATS_BH(mib, field) \
(per_cpu_ptr(mib[0], raw_smp_processor_id())->mibs[field]--)
If this is correct, then it seems done; one could use this macro or add
a corresponding UDP_DEC_STATS_BH to include/net/udp.h .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-12 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-06 18:25 [ PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 1/1] udp.c: counting InDatagrams which are never delivered Gerrit Renker
2006-06-12 4:29 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 6:02 ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
2006-06-12 6:13 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 7:22 ` Gerrit Renker
2006-06-12 6:18 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-12 6:49 ` David Miller
2006-06-12 7:43 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606120702.46014@strip-the-willow \
--to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@coreworks.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).