From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:47:14 -0600
Message-ID: <20060613164714.B7232@openss7.org>
References: <1150156562.19929.32.camel@w-sridhar2.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060613140716.6af45bec@localhost.localdomain> <20060613052215.B27858@openss7.org> <448F2A49.5020809@google.com> <20060613154031.A6276@openss7.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606131655580.4856@turbotaz.ourhouse> <448F3C83.9080606@google.com>
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gw.openss7.com ([142.179.199.224]:21937 "EHLO gw.openss7.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964791AbWFMWrP (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:47:15 -0400
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <448F3C83.9080606@google.com>; from phillips@google.com on Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:30:27PM -0700
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Daniel,

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary".  If so, then by
> definition there are none.

Well, being GPL compatible is not a requirement for an open source license.

IANAL, but last I checked, pure-BSD is not compatible with GPL (it actually
has to be dual-licensed BSD/GPL).