From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 04:54:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060614045423.A18812@openss7.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150281823.3490.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:43:43AM +0100
Alan,
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Alan Cox wrote:
> It isn't "policy" its called copyright law.
I know that I said I'd shut up, but I missed in TRIPS where it said
that symbols must be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL... Could you point that out?
(Just kidding.)
> You don't seem to understand copyright law either. The GPL like all
> copyright licenses deals with the right to make copies and to create and
> control derivative works. It's not "defeated" by four lines of code.
The 3 or 4 lines of code that I wrote as an original expression before
the patch was submitted.
> Is that a confession ;)
No, just a declaration: the code in question was released under GPL
Version 2.
> Copyright is not about novelty, you have it confused with the
> theoretical (not actual) role of patents. Wrong kind of intellectual
> monopoly right.
Yes, perhaps I should have said "original" instead of "novel". The patch
is not "original" as it was predated by equivalent (machine translatable)
original expressions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-14 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-12 23:56 [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API Sridhar Samudrala
2006-06-13 5:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-06-13 11:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2006-06-13 11:22 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-13 21:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-06-13 21:40 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-13 22:00 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 22:30 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-06-13 22:47 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-13 23:59 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14 0:31 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 0:53 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14 6:07 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 7:58 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14 9:28 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 10:43 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-14 10:54 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock [this message]
2006-06-14 10:36 ` Theodore Tso
2006-06-13 22:44 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-13 23:42 ` Ben Greear
2006-06-14 0:05 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14 0:18 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 0:29 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14 0:36 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 0:19 ` Ben Greear
2006-06-14 0:38 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 13:30 ` Harald Welte
2006-06-14 14:29 ` Erik Mouw
2006-06-14 15:26 ` Harald Welte
2006-06-14 17:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2006-06-14 18:03 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-14 20:52 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2006-06-13 14:58 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-06-13 16:27 ` Sridhar Samudrala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060614045423.A18812@openss7.org \
--to=bidulock@openss7.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).