From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:10:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20060615201024.GD32582@tuxdriver.com> References: <20060607140045.GB1936@elf.ucw.cz> <20060607160828.0045e7f5@griffin.suse.cz> <20060607141536.GD1936@elf.ucw.cz> <4486FD2F.8040205@gentoo.org> <20060608070525.GE3688@elf.ucw.cz> <4489ECD0.1030908@gentoo.org> <20060609223804.GB3252@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Daniel Drake , Jiri Benc , kernel list , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from rrcs-70-61-120-52.midsouth.biz.rr.com ([70.61.120.52]:35588 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031255AbWFOUKu (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:10:50 -0400 To: Pavel Machek Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060609223804.GB3252@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Which operation is the one which stops the interference, the enable or > > the disable? > > Disable alone was not enough to stop interference. I'm going to drop this patch for now, in the hopes that with Daniel's ZyDas contacts you can devise a more palatable solution. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com