From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: Suspending 802.11 drivers
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:14:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606152214.55745.IvDoorn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606152158.10079.mb@bu3sch.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1379 bytes --]
Hi,
> I am currently thinking about the best way to correctly
> implement PM suspending for wireless drivers.
> Currently, the 802.11 stack is not suspend aware (if I talk
> about "stack" here, I mostly mean devicescape).
> For example, if we suspend the bcm43xx driver, we don't
> notify the stack before doing so. That's a bug.
Similar in rt2x00. The basic approach in there is calling
netdev->open() and netdev->stop() which is not the most clean
or correct thing to do.
> I would say, we should have two functions, which are called
> from the driver suspend and resume callbacks.
> Let's call them
> ieee80211_suspend() and ieee80211_resume() for now.
> The suspend would save all status information, for example
> to which AP we are associated and so on. After that it would
> cleanly disassociate from the AP and do other cleanups which
> are needed.
> The resume function would try to re-esablish the connection.
> Of course, that will not always be possible (the notebook
> owner traveled around half the world between suspend and
> resume ;) ). But that does not matter. We simply return silently
> without a new association (Do a new scan, or whatever).
>
> Are such functions generally desireable?
Absolutely, I have been looking into this some time ago as well,
but due to lack of time haven't managed to get anything done.
Ivo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-15 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-15 19:58 Suspending 802.11 drivers Michael Buesch
2006-06-15 20:14 ` Ivo van Doorn [this message]
[not found] ` <200606152213.01631.florian@alphacore.net>
2006-06-15 20:42 ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-16 18:36 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-06-21 9:42 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-06-21 15:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-06-21 20:41 ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-22 5:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-06-21 22:07 ` Stefan Rompf
2006-06-22 10:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606152214.55745.IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--to=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).