Re: [PATCH 2/3] FS_ENET: use PAL for mii management

From: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
To: Gerhard Jaeger <g.jaeger@sysgo.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] FS_ENET: use PAL for mii management
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:38:43 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621113843.7d33bad3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606210920.37295.g.jaeger@sysgo.com>

На Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:20:36 +0200
Gerhard Jaeger <g.jaeger@sysgo.com> записано:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:58, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> > 
> > This patch should update the fs_enet infrastructure to utilize
> > Phy Abstraction Layer subsystem. Inside there are generic driver
> > rehaul, board-specific portion to respect driver changes (for
> > 8272ads and 866ads).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  arch/ppc/platforms/mpc8272ads_setup.c |  154 ++++++----
> >  arch/ppc/platforms/mpc866ads_setup.c  |  192 ++++++------
> >  arch/ppc/platforms/mpc885ads_setup.c  |  179 ++++--------
> >  arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_devices.c      |    8 +
> >  arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_sys.c          |    6 
> >  arch/ppc/syslib/pq2_devices.c         |    5 
> >  arch/ppc/syslib/pq2_sys.c             |    3 
> >  drivers/net/fs_enet/Makefile          |    6 
> >  drivers/net/fs_enet/fec.h             |   42 +++
> >  drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c    |  207 ++++++++-----
> >  drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-mii.c     |  507
> > ---------------------------------
> > drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h         |   40 ++-
> > drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c         |   10 -
> > drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-fec.c         |  132 +--------
> > drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c         |    4
> > drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c     |  384
> > +++++++++++++++---------- drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fec.c         |
> > 243 ++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-fixed.c       |   92
> > ------ include/asm-ppc/mpc8260.h             |    1
> > include/asm-ppc/mpc8xx.h              |    1
> > include/linux/fs_enet_pd.h            |   50 +-- 21 files changed,
> > 983 insertions(+), 1283 deletions(-)
> 
> [SNIPSNAP]
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> > b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c index 24a5e2e..145bf4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/mii.h>
> >  #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> >  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> > @@ -41,6 +42,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include "fs_enet.h"
> >  
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_8xx
> >  static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u8 **datp, u8 *mskp, int
> > port, int bit) {
> > @@ -106,64 +108,25 @@ static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_8260
> > -static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **dirp, u8 **datp, u8 *mskp, int
> > port, int bit) +static int bitbang_prep_bit(u8 **datp, u8 *mskp,
> > +		struct fs_mii_bit *mii_bit)
> 
> is it possible, that in case of CONFIG_8xx you'll have two times this 
> bitbang_prep_bit() function? 
> 
Hmm, yes, thanks for pointing that out. The problem is in other
thing though - the bitbang stuff got unified so there should be no
board-specific ifdefs like those.

This issue must have missed the cleanup, I'll fix and redo the patches.

--
Sincerely, Vitaly
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded