From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Michlmayr Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] tulip: fix for 64-bit mips Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 10:31:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20060625093108.GA29132@unjust.cyrius.com> References: <200606250845.k5P8j1Tt020829@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: val_henson@linux.intel.com, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, maillist@jg555.com, grundler@parisc-linux.org, pdh@colonel-panic.org Return-path: Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com ([65.19.161.204]:40456 "EHLO sorrow.cyrius.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932181AbWFYJbV (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jun 2006 05:31:21 -0400 To: akpm@osdl.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200606250845.k5P8j1Tt020829@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * akpm@osdl.org [2006-06-25 01:45]: > Cc: Valerie Henson > > [akpm: this is a previously-nacked patch, but the problem is real] And, for the record, Jeff's suggestion as to how to rework the patch: | Answer hasn't changed since this was last discussed: sleep, rather than | delay for an extra-long time. That's the only hurdle for the tulip | patches you keep resending. | Francois Romieu even had an untested patch that attempted this, | somewhere. Now we just need someone to complete this work... -- Martin Michlmayr tbm@cyrius.com