From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>,
Harry Edmon <harry@atmos.washington.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:22:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060625222243.GJ13255@w.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606191724.31305.ak@suse.de>
Hi Andi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:24:31PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > If you use "pmtmr" try to reboot with kernel option "clock=tsc".
>
> That's dangerous advice - when the system choses not to use
> TSC it often has a reason.
>
> >
> > On my Opteron AMD system i normally can route 400 kpps, but with
> > timesource "pmtmr" i could only route around 83 kpps. (I found the timer
> > to be the issue by using oprofile).
>
> Unless you're using packet sniffing or any other application
> that requests time stamps on a socket then the timer shouldn't
> make much difference. Incoming packets are only time stamped
> when someone asks for the timestamps.
I encountered the same problem on a dual core opteron equipped with a
broadcom NIC (tg3) under 2.4. It could receive 1 Mpps when using TSC
as the clock source, but the time jumped back and forth, so I changed
it to 'notsc', then the performance dropped dramatically to around the
same value as above with one CPU saturated. I suspect that the clock
precision is needed by the tg3 driver to correctly decide to switch to
polling mode, but unfortunately, the performance drop rendered the
solution so much unusable that I finally decided to use it only in
uniprocessor with TSC enabled.
> -Andi
Regards,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-25 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4492D5D3.4000303@atmos.washington.edu>
2006-06-17 22:35 ` Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20 Andrew Morton
2006-06-17 23:23 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-17 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-18 3:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-06-18 23:23 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-19 13:54 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-20 2:11 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-19 14:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-19 15:24 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 17:34 ` Chris Friesen
2006-06-19 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 18:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-25 21:51 ` Harry Edmon
2006-06-26 4:20 ` Bill Fink
2006-06-25 22:22 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2006-06-26 5:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-04 11:41 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-07-04 11:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-10 10:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-09-16 12:08 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 8:35 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 9:03 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 9:58 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 10:29 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 11:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 15:38 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 15:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 16:28 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 16:50 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 21:03 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 21:22 ` David Miller
2006-09-18 21:46 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-19 5:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-19 20:31 ` Thomas Graf
2006-09-19 20:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-19 5:52 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 21:18 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 22:00 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-18 21:57 ` David Lang
2006-09-19 19:40 ` David Miller
2006-09-19 19:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-09-18 22:03 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-19 19:41 ` David Miller
2006-09-19 19:47 ` David Miller
2006-09-22 15:35 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-09-22 15:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-22 16:51 ` Rick Jones
2007-03-06 13:25 ` Packet timestamps (was: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20) Vladimir B. Savkin
2007-03-06 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-06 14:43 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2007-03-06 15:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-06 18:15 ` Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 21:08 ` Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20 Vladimir B. Savkin
2006-09-18 14:09 ` David Miller
2006-09-18 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-18 15:19 ` Alan Cox
2006-09-18 15:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-19 16:40 ` Harry Edmon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060625222243.GJ13255@w.ods.org \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=harry@atmos.washington.edu \
--cc=hawk@diku.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).