From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Francois Barre" <francois.barre@gmail.com>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Tsvyashchenko" <lists@ndl.kiev.ua>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFT] bcm43xx: AccessPoint mode
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 21:39:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606282139.41441.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd8d0180606281227m309b0fcr94bc42c4c5247000@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 21:27, Francois Barre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for answering years after the patch post, I didn't have time to
> test this take2 patch before. I had a first look at it a couple of
> days ago, but... you know, that was not my day.
>
> > Well, it does not work 100%, but at least it's very promising.
> > We are able to create a bssid and correctly send beacon frames out.
> [...]
>
> For my very own situation, that is :
> - Apple Mini with a BCM 4306 (BigEndian)
> - Linux/Win32 boxes with USB and PCMCIA wifi cards (mostly 802.11b usb
> at the moment)
>
> Current status is this one :
> - master mode functionnal
> - dhcp serving, good uptime
> - no encryption, WEP or WPA of any kind tested yet
> - a nice 1.2MB/s bandwidth (I'm testing with a 802.11b at client side,
> and AFAIK, bcm43xx does not handle 802.11g yet, does it ?)
>
> *BUT* a big issue : I got a per-connection hang-up at client side on
> strong workloads, for both win32 and linux client side, with my usb
> dongle (which is running ndiswrapper on *nux, sorry for that, I'm
> ashamed of it, silly me, I know, but well... No choice, and the device
> was given me free of charge so...).
> Typical scenario is a ssh session on one hand and a ftp transfer on
> the other. The ftp hangs, while the ssh session stays up and going.
>
> I got no problem with the PCMCIA card (a rock-solid WG511T), on both
> linux and win32.
>
> Of course, the bcm43xx does not say anything about this (if it had
> said so, I would have posted logs along with this complain), so my
> conclusion would be :
>
> Why on earth is this a per-connection issue ? where do I miss
> something ? if I'm really missing packets on one connection, why is
> the other one continuing to live ? I may have forgotten a subtle
> detail of the TCP/IP behaviour here...
Well, I doubt it is a bcm43xx issue. But maybe. Not sure.
Do you run some QoS stuff? Some other quota stuff?
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-28 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-19 9:07 [PATCH, RFT] bcm43xx: AccessPoint mode Michael Buesch
2006-06-22 15:30 ` Jiri Benc
2006-06-22 19:08 ` Alexander Tsvyashchenko
2006-06-23 11:26 ` Jiri Benc
2006-06-23 18:19 ` hostapd patch for d80211 Jiri Benc
2006-06-23 21:13 ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-24 2:17 ` Jouni Malinen
2006-06-28 19:27 ` [PATCH, RFT] bcm43xx: AccessPoint mode Francois Barre
2006-06-28 19:39 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-06-28 19:50 ` Francois Barre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200606282139.41441.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=francois.barre@gmail.com \
--cc=lists@ndl.kiev.ua \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).