From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20060629.135310.74748885.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1151611866.11739.57.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
	<20060629.131938.55726619.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1151614033.11739.82.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:38604
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932509AbWF2Ux5 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:53:57 -0400
To: tom@opengridcomputing.com
In-Reply-To: <1151614033.11739.82.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:47:13 -0500

> I concede that features have been lost, but some applications benefit
> greatly from RDMA. For these applications and these customers,

TOE folks give the same story... it's a broken record, really.

Let us know when you can say something new about the situation.

Under Linux we get to make better long term architectually sane
decisions, even if it is to the dismay of the backers of certain
short-sighted pieces of technology.